River Shooter

UPDATED STORY: Meramec shooter found guilty

Felony assault, weapon charge added in wake of floater’s death
2014-05-15T07:00:00Z 2014-05-15T09:51:43Z UPDATED STORY: Meramec shooter found guilty Daily Journal Online
May 15, 2014 7:00 am

NEW STORY:  (AP) — An eastern Missouri jury has found a 59-year-old man guilty of second-degree murder in the July 2013 death of a float trip participant who was urinating near his property.

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch (bit.ly/1gp0Die ) reports that a Crawford County jury delivered its verdict Wednesday against Robert Crocker of Cuba, who lives along the Meramec River.

The jury deliberated for about two hours before determining that Crocker shot 48-year-old Paul Dart Jr. of Robertsville. He was among 50 friends and extended family members on a float trip party. Crocker claimed self-defense in the gravel-bar encounter.

Prosecutors countered that Crocker was far from the edge of his property near Steelville when the fatal shooting occurred. He and some of the floaters had argued before the shooting.


The Steelville man accused of fatally shooting a floater on the Meramec River on July 20 is facing additional felony charges and a trial date has been set.

James R. Crocker, 59, already charged with second-degree murder, is now facing two counts of first-degree assault, two counts of armed criminal action and one count of unlawful use of a weapon.

With the addition of the new charges his bond amount is now $877,000. A counsel status hearing on the new charges is set for 8:30 a.m. Friday before Judge Scott L. Bernstein.  

A trial date is set for 9 a.m. May 12-16 in Crawford County in the 42nd Judicial Circuit with Judge Kelly W. Parker presiding on the second-degree murder charge. Crawford County Prosecutor William Seay will present the case for the state. Crocker is represented by Attorney Michael A. Bert of St. Louis.

Authorities say Crocker admitted shooting Paul Dart Jr. of Franklin County during a property dispute on the river. He was subsequently arrested and is awaiting trial in the Crawford County Jail.

According to court documents in the first-degree assault charges, Crocker fired two "warning shots" into the gravel bar, one of which grazed a female victim and caused fragments to strike a male victim.

The female victim stated to authorities that while walking up the beach Crocker fired a "warning shot." She continued that she and Dart were trying to talk with Crocker to explain they had just stopped for a break. She told police that Crocker fired a second "warning shot" which grazed her body. Deputies observed redness to her skin and took photos.

A male victim stated that fragments from a "warning shot" struck him as well.

After the first two shots were fired, Crocker allegedly turned the gun on Dart and shot him in the face.

Crocker is also accused of, after killing Dart,  turning a gun on another victim and saying, "Do you want to be next? I have the power, you don't."

Detectives say they asked Crocker if he could have called law enforcement when the group refused to leave.

Crocker replied, "I guess I could have, but it's my property and I was going to protect it."

Crocker stated several times in the interview he was going to protect his property and if he would have left (to call police) the people would have been gone before law enforcement arrived, according to detectives.

Detectives then asked him even if the people had left, wouldn't that have been the desired result.

Crocker's reply according to the report was, "Yeah that would have worked too."

Pat Pratt is a reporter for the Daily Journal and can be reached at 573-518-3616 or ppratt@dailyjournalonline.com

Copyright 2015 Daily Journal Online. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

(7) Comments

  1. Bk
    Report Abuse
    Bk - May 15, 2014 4:15 pm
    I agree, he should loose his life like the man he shot in face.
  2. Bk
    Report Abuse
    Bk - May 15, 2014 4:14 pm
    All I know is property owner was not on his property when he shot another man. We all know the situation, somebody felt they were above the law and now my hard earned money has to house and feed this murderer
  3. blasterrat1
    Report Abuse
    blasterrat1 - May 15, 2014 11:37 am
    I think its pretty obvious who the criminal is. Sad is He only got 25 years!
  4. tee mason
    Report Abuse
    tee mason - September 12, 2013 9:24 pm
    Sad things is so many will comment on this story.
    But not know the situation.
  5. Little Brother
    Report Abuse
    Little Brother - September 05, 2013 5:08 pm
    The story continually changes. In this version, one should probably retreat when someone is standing on their property and firing warning shots near you, or at you. Not a good time to explain your need for a break.
  6. DesotoJoe
    Report Abuse
    DesotoJoe - September 05, 2013 2:56 am
    How about trying him in court first.
  7. stinkysmom
    Report Abuse
    stinkysmom - September 05, 2013 1:13 am
    They should have left, they should not have challenge and came at him on his property.....I think they are just adding to the story a little to beef up the prosecutions charges......Very sorry someone is dead......and it should not have happen for reasons on both sides part.
Add Comment
You must Login to comment.

Click here to get an account it's free and quick